Solicitors Online- Advice on Changing Your Name

Online solicitors giving legal advice on how to change your name by deed poll. Solicitors online 24-7 answering questions on all areas of UK law. A question is answered every 12 seconds.

Posted in English Law, Legal advice, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Advice Online – Ask questions on Wills & Estates

Legal advice online from qualified solicitors, barristers, lawyers and legal experts. Our Experts are available 24/7 to answer questions on all aspects of UK law. Have a question about a will or estate ask them get an answer in minutes. No waiting, no registration, secure and confidential.

Posted in English Law, Family Law, Inheritance tax, Legal advice, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Advice Online – Trespassing Laws

Get legal advice online from qualified and verified legal Experts. Get answers to legal questions in minutes from the comfort of your own home. Experts available 24-7. Get advice on law relating to trespassing

Posted in English Law, Legal advice, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Advice Online – How To Deal With The Police

Online legal advice, ask solicitors questions online on all areas of UK law. Ask a question and get an answer asap. Solicitors online 24-7.Online solicitors available at Expert Answers. Get advice on all areas of UK law..

Posted in driving offences, driving without car insurance, driving without car tax, driving without due care, driving without mot, Motoring, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, traffic offence solicitors | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Legal Advice – Your Car Insurance

Get online legal advice from qualified , barristers, solicitors and legal experts. Ask solicitors legal questions get an Expert Answer within minutes. Need to know about driving without MOT and how it affects your insurance. Ask them and they will answer.

Posted in challenging parking fines, challenging parking tickets, Drink Driving, Driving, driving ban appeal, driving offences, driving without a licence, driving without car insurance, driving without car tax, driving without due care, driving without mot, English Law, fighting parking fines, fighting parking tickets, fine for driving without insurance, Motoring, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, traffic offence solicitors, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Advice Online – How To Act In Court

Get online legal advice from qualified , barristers, solicitors and legal experts. Ask solicitors legal questions get an Expert Answer within minutes. Need to know how to act in court or what to expect in court ask them and they will answer.

Posted in English Law, Legal advice, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online legal Advice – How To Deal With Noisy Neighbours

Get online legal advice from qualified , barristers, solicitors and legal experts. Ask solicitors legal questions get an Expert Answer within minutes. Need to know how to deal with noisy neighbours ask them and they will answer.

Posted in dealing with noisy neighbours, English Law, Legal advice, neighbor disputes, neighbour disputes, noisy neighbours law, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Questions – How To Avoid Paying Parking Tickets

Get online legal advice from qualified , barristers, solicitors and legal experts. Ask solicitors legal questions get an Expert Answer within minutes. Need to know how to avoid paying parking tickets, ask them and they will answer.

Posted in appealing against parking fines, appealing against parking tickets, driving offences, illegal parking fines, illegal parking tickets, Motoring, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, Parking, Parking Fines, parking offences, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, traffic offence solicitors, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Advice Solicitors Online – Theft

Get online legal advice from qualified , barristers, solicitors and legal experts. Ask solicitors legal questions get an Expert Answer within minutes. Need to know the definition of theft, ask them and they will answer.

Posted in boundary disputes, dealing with noisy neighbours, English Law, Legal advice, neighbor disputes, neighbour disputes, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Legal Advice – Driving Offence Solicitors

Get online legal advice from qualified , barristers, solicitors and legal experts. Ask solicitors legal questions get an Expert Answer within minutes. Need to know about traffic offences, ask them and they will answer.

Posted in appealing against parking fines, appealing against parking tickets, challenging parking fines, road traffic offences, Speeding, traffic offence solicitors | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – Road Traffic Signs

online solicitor gives uk legal help online

online solicitor gives uk legal help online

Did you know?

A speed limit is unenforceable without clear signing of the speed limit.  S85 RTRA demands that the authorities erect signs which give the motorist ‘adequate guidance’ of the speed limit.  It used to be thought that ‘adequate guidance’ meant total compliance with the requirements and any imperfection could be used to escape liability.  There had been support for that proposition in earlier case law.  The case of Coombes was helpful to the motorist.  But the recent appeal of Peake has severely restricted this point.  The Court in that case decided that all that need be asked is whether there is sufficient compliant signing such that any motorist travelling at excess speed at the point of enforcement will have been given ‘adequate guidance’ of the speed limit.

Inadequacy of road signing remains a proper challenge to the prosecution.  Traffic signs are regularly badly maintained.  Peake has added a further hurdle for the defence to overcome but it can be done.  The test is now twofold.  Firstly, the deficiencies must exist.  Secondly, they must be such as to weaken the ‘adequate guidance’ given to the motorist of the speed limit.

Posted in Driving, driving offences, Motoring, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, online solicitor, Parking, Parking Fines, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, Solicitor, traffic offence solicitors, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – Devices To Provide Samples for Drink Driving

If the breath testing device is unavailable then a specimen of blood or urine may be required.  The defendant is not entitled to choose which device he uses.  A breath testing device will generally be the preference of the police and they will only depart from that if the machine is unavailable, unreliable or there is some other practicable reason.

If blood or urine specimens are to be required, it is the choice of the officer which specimen is taken.  The only exception is where a medical practitioner is of the view that blood cannot and should not be taken.  Only then urine must be required.

However, if a defendant advances legitimate reasons for refusing a blood test, the exercise of the officer’s discretion will be considered.  The case of Joseph v DPP involved a man who refused a blood test on religious grounds but an officer insisted upon it.  The Court held that the officer’s choice was so unreasonable as to be unlawful.

A defendant who has provided two specimens of breath, the lower of which is no greater than 50 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath may insist upon a blood or urine test.  If such a test is taken then neither of the two breath test results can be used by the Crown.  If a defendant elects to provide such a test, then the choice of blood or urine remains for the officer.

Posted in breath test, Breathalyser, Drink Driving, Driving, driving offences, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – Speeding

Automatic speed detecting devices are widespread. Procedure is very important with such devices. A Notice of Intended Prosecution will need to be served and the fixed penalty offer can be used.

Both roads and individual vehicles can be subject to speed restrictions. As a rule before a speed limit is imposed the approval of the Secretary of State is required. This does not apply to speed limits of 20 mph which are created by individual local councils and can be enforced in law.

A restricted road is any road which has a system of street lamps no more than 185 metres apart. Such a road is restricted to 30 mph by reason of the street lamps. This has thrown up a large number of challenges. The higher courts have consistently held that minor breaches will be tolerated. In Spittle v Kent County Constabulary lamps 212 metres apart gave rise to a proper conviction as the difference was so minimal that it could be ignored. More significant deviations will not.

If there is no system of street lighting then a person cannot be convicted unless the limit is indicated by traffic signs. The signs must conform to the requirements in law. There should be regular repeaters signs unless this is a motorway or a restricted road.

Posted in Driving, Motoring, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, online solicitor, Solicitor, Speeding | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – Speeding and Corrobation

A person cannot be convicted of speeding solely on the evidence of one person.  There need not necessarily be two witnesses but there must be some corroborative evidence.

The most common source of corroboration comes from the speedometer reading of a police vehicle.  A police officer can give evidence of his opinion that the defendant was speeding and support it by pointing out that he travelled at the same rough speed as the defendant and his own speedometer gave a particular reading.

A radar gun or a VASCAR device can also be used.  The Crown do not need to be able to establish that these devices are accurate although if they do not, there are challenges that can be brought.

GATSO devices have restricted approval and cannot be used to detect speeds in an area where the speed limit is less than twenty miles per hour.

To ensure that the evidence produced by the device is admissible the Crown must serve upon the defendant a copy at least seven days in advance of the hearing.  The defendant can at least three days before the hearing serve a notice on the prosecution requiring the attendance of the person who signed the document and only then can the document be admitted as evidence.  It is often worthwhile doing so as the person in question is rarely available to attend.

(Please Note: We welcome comments, inane , off topic comments or links for the sake of links will be deleted. If you cannot be bothered to at least read the post and leave relevant comments…we will just delete it. )

Posted in Driving, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, Speeding, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – Fixed Penalty Notices

Sections 54(1) and (2) RTOA 1988 provide that a constable in uniform who has reason to believe that a fixed penalty offence is being or has been committed may give a person a fixed penalty notice.

Only a constable in uniform can issue an FPN.  There is debate over what being in uniform means and this is worth a challenge.  The Courts have settled upon a definition of ‘being in uniform’ which allows the motorist to identify the officer as an officer.

If the offence involves obligatory endorsement then an FPN can only be issued if the person produces his licence and the number of points will not render him liable to disqualification.  The driving licence must be surrendered voluntarily.  The police have no power to seize it.  The person cannot demand an FPN.  It is entirely a matter of police discretion.

If the person is willing to receive a notice but cannot produce his licence immediately he can be asked to do so within seven days at a police station.

If a fine is paid by the end of the suspended period of enforcement then no proceedings can be brought against the person.

(Please Note: We welcome comments, inane , off topic comments or links for the sake of links will be deleted. If you cannot be bothered to at least read the post and leave relevant comments…we will just delete it. )

Posted in driving offences, driving without due care, driving without mot, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, traffic offence solicitors, traffic offences | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – Moving Traffic Contravention

Councils have taken to enforcing some moving traffic contraventions by means of CCTV or Smart Cars.

There are an innumerable number of such contraventions but all share the same appeal procedure.

Always check the signing in the area.  It needs to be present and compliant with the RTA requirements but also to be located so that you were informed of it in advance of the manoeuvre.  Also, check the other signs in the area to ensure that there was no contradiction.

Ensure that there is a CCTV warning sign in the area.  If there are not then a recent case in Wirral has suggested that the fines may be invalid.

Ask for evidence of you committing the offence.  Check any CCTV footage carefully.  They need to be able to show that you committed the offence with the sign in full view.  Attempting to commit the contravention is not sufficient.  With a banned right turn, a three point turn is not a contravention.

Ask the authority to provide you with a copy of the Traffic Order.  Some traffic offences do not require a Traffic Order but most do and it will need to match the prohibitions enforced by signs and road markings exactly.  Without it they are void.

Always remember, never pay if you intend to appeal.  Doing so is an admission of guilt.

(Please Note: We welcome comments, inane , off topic comments or links for the sake of links will be deleted. If you cannot be bothered to at least read the post and leave relevant comments…we will just delete it. )

Posted in Driving, driving offences, Legal advice, Motoring, motoring offence advice, motoring offences, online solicitor, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, Solicitor, traffic offence solicitors, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – Parking Fines Served By Post

Parking fines and parking tickets served by post are capable of appeal just like any other.  Do not presume that the CCTV is overwhelming evidence that an offence has been committed.

The Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) must be issued within twenty eight days of the contravention.  If it is not, they are time barred and it is void.

The PCN itself must state the date of the notice, the matters alleged, the grounds of the allegation, the charge must be paid not later than the last day of the twenty eight day period, any discount offered.  Also there must be mention of the fact that if there have been no representations and the fine has not been paid, the Council will increase the fine.  They must make clear the amount of the increase.  The penalty charge must record that it was issued by post and the reasons for doing so.  Not all are lawful.

A penalty charge notice (PCN) must also specify that representations may be made to the enforcement authority but that any received outside of the 28 days period may be disregarded.  It must offer an address to which representations can be made and offer a list of the various forms of representations that may be accepted.

Many local councils do rely on parking tickets that do not comply and so are unlawfully issued.

(Please Note: We welcome comments, inane , off topic comments or links for the sake of links will be deleted. If you cannot be bothered to at least read the post and leave relevant comments…we will just delete it. )

Posted in appealing against parking fines, appealing against parking tickets, Driving, driving offences, fighting parking fines, fighting parking tickets, illegal parking fines, illegal parking tickets, Legal advice, Motoring, online solicitor, Parking, Parking Fines, parking offences, Road Traffic, road traffic offences, Solicitor, traffic offence solicitors, traffic offences | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor-A Tweet too far.

Get legal advice online from the professionals

A few nights ago I read an article about Courtney Love (celebrity rock musician) being embroiled in a defamation suit for some comments she posted on Twitter, the ever-popular digital method of stating your inner monologue online in no more than 140 characters. You have just read 190 characters, so you can imagine how brief the sentences must be.

According to the American Bar Association Journal a social media expert has been called in to testify whether tweets are expressions of opinion or statements of fact. However, because tweets are so short it can be very difficult to provide context.

Bryan Freedman, the lawyer who is suing Love, is concerned that the line between nastiness and free speech is beginning to blur; his opinion is that ‘tweets’ should be protected from liability so long as they represent opinion. He also acted in a similar case for gossip guru Perez Hilton.

In the UK, April 2010, Simon Singh came through the other side of a fierce libel battle brought about by the British Chiropractors Association; it involved a comment he made in the Guardian two years previously: it cost Mr Singh nearly £200,000.

This case drew attention to the draconian nature of defamation law in the UK. In a nutshell: claimants have to show that the material published is defamatory and that it is “reasonably understood” to refer to them…but they don’t have to show that the statement was false.

It is up to the Defendant to prove that the statement was true

Consequently, it gives anyone with substantial resources free-reign to litigate against people they disagree with or who have made statements putting forward a different point of view. The onus is on the little guy to defend themself in court: extremely costly, time-consuming and potentially ruinous.

UK defamation law is regarded as “repressive and unfair” and allows large companies to “essentially quash dissent and to destroy criticism”. There have been many calls for legal reform, but as of yet there has been no change. US law, on the other hand, gives Freedom of Speech more importance, based as it is on the American Constitution. This has a direct influence on Federal Law. In comparison, the European Convention on Human Rights has not shaped the interpretation of Libel Law in the UK.

So why worry about all this?

You will probably know someone who uses online social networks or even use them yourself. Facebook is one of the many pan-global ways of instantly communicating with all your friends and expressing opinions about anything. It is also alarmingly easy for strangers (in particular, company representatives) to see your comments.  That could spell disaster if you’re seen to be venting your frustration over a product/service. There have already been cases in the UK for defamatory Facebook comments. With Twitter comments being the subject of Libel actions in the US it makes you wonder: if people in the US (with their fairer defamation laws) can litigate over a handful of poorly chosen words, how easy will it be for someone over here to be sued over a comment on Facebook or other social networks? Be careful what you Twitter!

Posted in Legal advice, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – How To Save Money Getting Divorced

There is no doubt about it divorces can be expensive.  The more you argue over distribution of assets the richer the lawyers become, the more you fall out with the ex then the less you both get. Remember that two Solicitors arguing with each other at Save money on UK legal help£175.00 per hour each means that your total assets are depleted by £350.00 for every hour that the Solicitors argue.

Don’t let Solicitors wind you up.  Many divorcing couples argue for weeks (or indeed months or years) and end up settling for what was on the table in the first place.

Ask for an estimate of costs before you start the legal process.  Ask to be kept informed as to how costs are being spent and the level that expenditure is reached.  You don’t want to expect a bill for £500.00 and find out that its £5,000.00.  Set an upper limit of costs which must not be exceeded of (say) £2,000.00 which should not be exceeded without your authority.

Do try and agree with your ex what is happening.  Your CD collection in the whole scale of things is valuable to you but it is of no monetary value.  Similarly clothes are worth very little as indeed is furniture.  If you have a three-piece suite that cost a grand then the cost of arguing in correspondence in three hours you could have bought a new suite.  Sometimes, discretion is the better part of valour and you may be better off walking away from it.  In addition, if you say to your ex “OK, you can have it”.  On many occasions you are more likely to get what you want.  Second hand furniture is worth very little.

Of course, if the house is full of expensive antiques you may decide to want to take a more robust line.
If you have not been married for very long and your ex is a multimillionaire don’t expect to walk away with half your partner’s worldly wealth’s after 18 months of marriage.  It just doesn’t happen.  You can argue all you like (remember it costs £350.00 per hour in reality) but you just simply will not get 50%.

Remember also that in matrimonial matters the Court do not apportion blame in most cases.  It doesn’t matter that the partner was caught in bed with the au pair, the Court are simply not interested.  The only time the Court will take into account conduct is if that conduct directly affected the children.  They may then favour the agreed party in any financial settlement.

The above is not meant to be a definitive Do It Yourself divorce course but simply a few pointers that may help you save some money.

Remember, the more you talk between you the less money it is going to cost in legal costs.  Do try to avoid arguing through lawyers or letting lawyers wind either of you up at all costs (no pun intended).
Posted in Divorce, English Law, Family Law, marriage breakdown, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – Pre-nup, Up and Away

An examination of the recent news in Family Law of the Radmacher case, the Law Commission consultation and what it could possibly mean for today’s couples.
In November last year the Law Gazette reported on the Supreme Court’s decision in Radmacher v Granatino; after the collapse of her marriage it was ruled that German heiress Katrin Radmacher should keep the bulk of her £100 million after the ex-husband sought to claim a greater share. A majority decision was reached on the operability of pre-nuptial agreements.

To quote:  “The Court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties in their agreement”

In English, it means that when there is a pre-nuptial agreement in place, the courts will give it serious consideration unless it’s extremely unfair. This doesn’t sound like earth-shattering new until you realise that the driving concept of divorce law is that the divorcing couples should get a fair division of the ‘matrimonial property’.

English Family Law is currently being taught as one of the fairest laws in the Western World. Celebrities flock from overseas to get married (and divorced) because of the fairness of this system.
In (very) short: when trying to decide who gets what out of the divorce the Courts take into account not only who the breadwinner is, but rather the contributions of the parties to the marriage: the effort involved in the housewife’s (or househusband’s) raising of children and generally making the house a home isn’t necessarily quantifiable but is as valued as much as bringing home the bacon.The idea was that, after the divorce, the parties achieved a ‘clean break’ and are able to live the rest of their lives as comfortably as possible; whereas women usually got the raw deal before this.

Recently though, the Law Commission has discovered that sometimes even this concept of fairness isn’t all that fair. If a couple marry and one of them was to inherit a sizeable estate, family business, had property from a previous settlement (or was a Beatle and had millions from royalties, ahem) it could be said that it would be perceived as ‘matrimonial property’ and it would be split as fairly as possible for the reasons above: the business/property could be liquidated and the money would go to the ex: a fair outcome for him/her, a lost family legacy for you.

Addressing this inequality, the government in 1998 produced a green paper which set out recommendations regarding pre-nuptial agreements: the courts still upheld the overriding notion of fairness, looking at each case objectively and trying to achieve a fair and balanced outcome for all parties involved, but the court’s attitude to pre-nuptial agreements had started to change. Thirteen years and a spate of pre-nup cases later, Radmacher is being seen as a harbinger of Family Law reform.

The Law Commission has recently been producing a consultation paper examining whether pre-nuptial agreements should be placed on a statutory footing. It goes on to consider to what limit agreements could operate (the best example is that of children: an agreement cannot prejudice their reasonable needs) and even what could be considered ‘non-matrimonial property’. Concerns about what may happen when there is a change of circumstances after the marriage may in future be dealt with a ‘sunset clause’, where the pre-nup would automatically terminate after an agreed number of years, or at a specific event such as the birth of a child.

While it is currently accepted as ‘rich-man’s law’ Professor Elizabeth Cooke, the commissioner leading the consultation, recognises the need for less wealthy couples to be protected also, and this consultation shall be led with their needs borne in mind.
The consultation paper will be published in 2012.
Posted in Divorce, Family Law, online solicitor, Solicitor | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – How To Avoid Neighbour Disputes

At some stage during our lives nearly all of us will have a dispute with our neighbours and seek legal advice. It may be a disagreement over a boundary hedge, parking into the gateway, overhanging trees, music being played too loud (particularly if your neighbours didn’t get an invite to the party!) or a whole host of either extremely significant or completely insignificant issues needing legal advice.

Whether the issues are significant or insignificant really is subjective. Clearly, the parties must think that they are significant otherwise the dispute would not have arisen in the first place requiring the need to see legal help.

I moved to my current house in September 1999. I was downsizing from a big house to a small house after divorce. I had a buyer for my house but I couldn’t really find what I wanted. The house I bought (which is the one I am still in), was on the market and ready for immediate occupation. It wasn’t particularly the type of house I wanted. It wasn’t in the town I wanted. I wasn’t in the kind of area I wanted, but, I could move straight in. I thought however that it would be ok for twelve months. Ten years later, here I am writing this from the same house!.

Why am I still in the same house (that I didn’t want to live in, in the 1st place), 10 years later you may ask? I am really fortunate that I have the best neighbours you could ever wish for. My next door neighbour on one side is gradually replacing the fence and every now and again asks me for a contribution which I am happy to give him. There is an absolute prohibition in the deeds against boundary fences. I couldn’t care less.

He has two large aviaries in which he keeps budgerigars and finches. His garden is beautiful and the noise of the birds is therapeutic. I couldn’t care less that there is a restricted covenant preventing people keeping birds.

I have cats; the cats sometimes go to sleep on top of the aviary. I have told my neighbour that if the cats cause a problem throws a bucket of water on them. They won’t do it again. It has never been a problem. They lie in the sun and my neighbour always asks after the cats welfare.

On the other side of my house, the neighbours have threatened that if ever I move house they will move too! It looks like I am here for the duration.

As one of my hobbies I like to tinker with motorcycles and cars. Both neighbours on the other side of the road tinker with cars we often give each other bits of advice and chew the fat over some mechanical problem or other. My neighbours are brilliant.

Even so, I have had a couple of “legal problems”. Once when I was burning some trees and the next door neighbour but one (a super guy) was getting more than his fair share of smoke, he jumped up and down-a lot. I don’t blame him for moaning, it was my fault.

The other “legal disagreement” (really too strong a word) was with my bird keeping neighbour with whom I have a superb relationship. The course of “true love” never runs smooth!

As mentioned previously, I like to tinker with mechanical things. I only have a single garage and it doesn’t give me a lot of room to tinker. An architect pal of mine had come up with a wonderful idea of making the house in to a sort of “ L” shape with a double garage forming the foot of the L. I thought it was a brilliant idea but it did mean that a; it would block part of my neighbours view and b; it would remove some (note “some”, not “all” or “a lot”) of my neighbours light. My architect friend didn’t think I would get planning permission but I thought it was worth a punt.

The only objection I had to the planning permission was from my next door neighbour. I had discussed with him the fact that I was applying for planning permission for a garage and it was only when he saw the plans that he put his objection in. However, he did tell me that he was going to object and I think, in all honesty, that his objection was not unreasonable. I didn’t get planning permission.

The whole matter didn’t cause any friction between us (at least I hope it didn’t, we’re still speaking five years later!) and I eventually ended up having a workshop built at the rear of my house.

I get many queries about neighbour disputes. Usually, by the time people come to see me for legal advice the dispute is at skirmish stage. Usually what happens after the next door neighbour gets a letter from a solicitor, the previous skirmish escalates in to a full blown conflict. Beware of seeking legal advice and sending solicitors letters. As Bob Hoskins said on the BT ads, “It’s good to talk”.

Many people of course don’t want to upset their neighbours but still want to resolve any dispute. Negotiation (talking) is the way forward if the neighbour will negotiate. That is, if the neighbour will even speak! At least you must try. At least if you can get some dialogue going your part of the way there.

I get clients who come to see me, embroiled in some dispute or other who are not on speaking terms with their neighbours; the neighbours are running roughshod all over them and yet they still don’t want to upset their neighbours! I’m afraid that it is impossible to have your cake and eat it now would be a good time to seek legal advice. If the neighbours are upsetting you and they refuse to negotiate then it is impossible to resolve the matter without you upsetting them. Certainly, once they get a solicitors letter they’re going to be royally wicked off. Touche.

The moral therefore is not to let any dispute escalate into a full blown conflict. As soon as even the grain of an issue between you and your neighbour arises, speak to them about it. Do not say “I am not being funny but …”, because as soon as somebody says “I am not being funny but …”, they know that you are being funny (and not in an amusing way!). When you are talking to your neighbours, smile. A smile breaks down a lot of barriers. Try and see their point of view and try to get them to see yours. BUT, most importantly, keep talking and try to reach agreement. Do not fight fire with fire eg, don’t turn your radio up loud just because they have. You are stooping to their level.

If ultimately talking doesn’t work, you may have to look at legal action. Over the course of the next few articles I will talk about some individual boundary disputes and how you can deal with them. Meanwhile, if you have a neighbour problem, just try to ignore it until you read my next article.

Coming up.

Your Right to Light and the view from your window

Posted in boundary disputes, dealing with noisy neighbours, neighbor disputes, neighbour disputes, noisy neighbours law | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Solicitor Online – UK Legal Misconceptions

During a recent conversation with a client he said he thought UK law was an ass. I pointed out it was not UK law that was an ass but legal advice misconceptions. Some of which are just a nuisance whereas others will be seriously detrimental to life and wealth being…below are just a few UK legal misconceptions

Misconception: If you live with someone you are Common-Law Husband and Wife.
Reality: The law does not recognise Common-Law Wife. You’re either “married” or “not married”. There is nothing in between. The legal phrase for people who live together is Cohabitees.

Misconception:
If I’m married and I die my wife will get everything whether I’ve written a will or not.
Reality: This is not the case. If you die without a will you have died Intestate. Your wife may end up with a very small proportion of your estate and your children a large chunk of it automatically. You should really write a will.

Misconception:
You can’t marry your mother in Law.
Reality: Oh yes you can (but why would you want to do that?!)

Misconception:
If you want to copyright something you simply put it in an envelope and post it to yourself.
Reality: This is no proof of copyright at all. The contents can easily be changed. A better way is to get the material date stamped by a firm of solicitors or put a first class postage stamp on the material and ask your local post office to cancel the stamp with their date stamp.

Misconception:
If I am stopped for speeding by one policeman on his own I can not be prosecuted.
Reality: Oh yes you can. The courts are more likely to believe a policeman saying you were speeding other than you saying you weren’t.

Misconception:
If I cover the number plate of my car in cling film speed cameras can’t pick up my number plate.
Reality: This may or may not be true but in any event it is illegal and you can be prosecuted for obscuring the number plate even if you are not speeding! We suggest that you don’t try.

Misconception:
Trespasses will be prosecuted.
Reality: Trespass is not a crime it’s a civil matter. You can not be prosecuted for trespass. You can sue someone for trespass but unless they have done some damage you are not likely to get any money. If they continually trespass the best you are likely to get is a court order telling them not to do it anymore.

Misconception:
If you put “goods belong to the seller until paid for in full” on your invoices it means that you can go and get them back if the buyer doesn’t pay for them.
Reality: This may or may not be the case it depends on how long you have been dealing with the customer for and what he has done with them. More often than not this clause is completely unenforceable although it can be enforced by wording it properly.

Misconception:
If I partake in an activity and I sign a form that says I agree that I will not hold the organisers responsible for any death or injury then I can not bring a claim.
Reality: It is impossible to exclude death or injury as any consequence of any negligent action. This clause is simply unenforceable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

Misconception:
If a trespasser hurts himself by, for example, tripping on a hazard on my premises, (perhaps a burglar even during the course of a crime) then that’s tough on him.
Reality: Under the Occupiers Liability Act 1984 I have a duty to keep even a burglar safe from harm when on my premises! (This act was brought in to prevent victims laying traps for unwary burglars)

Misconception:
There is an old law which says that policeman must walk with one foot in the gutter.
Reality: Oh no there isn’t. If there is we have never found it.

Misconception:
A policeman must wear his hat if he arrests you otherwise the arrest is unlawful.
Reality: If you get arrested for something and the policeman doesn’t have his hat on don’t think you’re going to walk away from it.

Misconception:
It is legal to kill a Welshman inside Chester City walls after dark.
Reality: It may have been true 2000 years ago but in the 21st century it would be a sure fire way to life imprisonment.

Misconception:
Housebreaking is during the day, burglary is at night.
Reality: There is no offence of housebreaking in the UK, the offence of burglary is entering a building as a trespasser with the intent to commit theft, GBH or rape.

Misconception:
If a limited company owes money and goes bust there is nothing I can do to get it back.
Reality: Although you will usually be an unsecured creditor and therefore way down the list of people for payment, the limited company is a “one man band” and is one individuals “alter ego” then its possible to sue the individual “behind the corporate veil”.

……..and some interesting facts…….

If you take something from someone without their knowledge and leave a note saying “I will bring your xxx back next week” AND you take it back next week having treated it as your own and returning it in exactly the same condition, then you can not be charged with theft. In these circumstances we struggle to find what you could be charged with. Bizarre, but true.

A man once stole a ladder and committed a burglary using the ladder wearing nothing but his socks. It must have been a warm night!

On the road, if there are no speed limit signs and the street lights are less than 200 meters apart then it is a 30 mph speed limit.

If someone owes you some money and pays you (say) half of it on the basis that “its half or nothing” and you accept it under duress it’s still usually possible to sue the debtor for the balance (this goes back to the 17th ct).

Slavery wasn’t abolished legally until 1998 by the Human Rights Act because the 1833 Abolition of Slavery Act did not define what slavery was.

Posted in Legal advice, UK Law | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – Why You Need To Make A Will?

* Sooner or later, you are going to die. That is a fact!

* Many people in Britain do not have a Will. Why is that? Quite simply, it is due to the fact that few of us like to think about our own mortality. We are going to die,…eventually. Some of us sooner than later. As a result, when we die, our wishes may not be carried out. This can cause untold distress and upset for your family at a time when they are already grieving the loss of a loved one. All this could easily have been avoided by writing your will.
* If you were to die without having left a Will, your Estate is administered in accordance with the current Rules of Intestacy.  The rules apply a rigid formula and govern how your Estate will be divided amongst your family.  This can even result in your spouse not being entitled to all the assets in your estate.
* If you die without a Will or you have not left specific instructions in it regarding gifts to specific family members or friends, but your spouse can show that he or she is entitled to all the assets in your Estate, then those assets of particular sentimental value to you may not go to who you wanted.  This is of particular importance if you are in a second marriage or relationship and where one or both of you have children from your first marriages or relationships. We all want to make sure proper provisions are in place for our children.
Important Points To Consider When Writing A Will

1. Making a Will is the only way to ensure your property and possessions will go where you want after your death.

2. If you die without making a Will, then contrary to common belief, your belongings will not necessarily go to your wife or husband. The Law, not you or anyone else decides how much should go to each of your relatives. Your friends will get nothing.

3. A Will is essential to provide properly for young children in the event of both parents dying.

4. You and your partner should each have your own separate Will but the contents can “mirror” each other’s if required. There is no such thing as a “joint” Will.

5. If you have married, separated, divorced or remarried since you made your original Will, it is essential to make a new Will as the provisions in your old will may have been automatically revoked.

6. Times change. Once you have made your Will, look at it every year to make sure it still fits your wishes and circumstances. Simple amendments can be done by adding a Codicil to your existing will.

7. Always seek professional advice when you make or change your Will. Home made Wills may be incorrectly drawn up and executed and so may not stand up in Law.

8. You can reduce the tax your Estate will suffer by careful drafting of the terms of the Will.
A good Solicitor can assist with the preparation of your Will.  The costs of a simple Will for an individual starts at £100.00 plus VAT and for a couple £150.00 plus VAT. 

N.B. Specialised taxation, trust advice or complicated Wills will require a Wills & Probate specialist who will be able to give you the help you need.
Posted in Family Law, Legal advice, UK Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – More About Bailiffs Powers

A local authority can levy distress upon a ratepayers’ goods.  It will need to obtain a liability order from the Magistrates Court first.  That order acts as a distress warrant without the need to return to the Magistrates Court.

It is always useful to negotiate with the local authority to see if agreement cannot be reached.  Only if it fails or an agreement is reached which is broken will goods be levied.

The bailiff can levy goods at any time although and from any location.  A bailiff can be refused entry but it is not practicable to refuse entry to such a person in the commercial sector where the retailer cannot ascertain the identity of those that enter his premises.

The bailiff can seize any goods that belong either jointly or wholly to the debtor.  In a business setting goods will often belong to third parties.  If a bailiff does seize goods belonging to another then the debtor must immediately bring this to the attention of the bailiff.  Initially the burden of proof is with the debtor but the bailiff will be under an obligation to act with caution thereafter.

Once the goods have been seized the bailiff will seek to impound them.  That can be done by immediately removing goods or placing them into a walking possession agreement.  The latter will mean that the goods remain with the debtor and can be used by him but disposing of them would be unlawful.

Posted in bailiffs powers, English Law, UK Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Getting divorced – Advice from online solicitor

If you have finally decided that you can’t work it out and you are getting divorced then you may find the following useful. Hopefully, not only will it be useful, it will also save you some money. Hopefully it will also remove a little bit of the mystery surrounding some of the phrases such as “ancillary relief”.

The following is not meant to be the definitive guide to divorce. There are plenty of books been written on the subject (many of them read by lawyers at a very expensive hourly rate!) and a visit to the local bookshop or internet will come up with volumes and volumes.

Of course, having read this, got divorced and read a few books on the subject you may decide to become a divorce solicitor. Others have done it.

I digress.

Divorce can be broken down into its component parts:

1.         Dissolution of the marriage

2.         Ancillary matter

“Ancillary matters” simply refers to money and children.

“Ancillary relief” is not something you take for an ancillary headache but legalise for maintenance.

Taking each in turn.

Dissolution. The divorce itself.

The most common reasons for divorce are:

Living apart for two years (by consent) or five years (with no consent)

Adultery (fairly obvious)

Unreasonable behaviour

I am not going to get into getting the marriage annulled here (usually for illegality, none consummation, none consent or some other reason) because that is a story for another day.

Adultery

Remember this isn’t a definitive guide this is merely pointers. If you’re “soon to be” ex has committed adultery with (she) every member of the eighth army or (he) all 47 Dagenham Girl Pipers, they have admitted adultery. Don’t waste time and money gathering evidence. One count is enough. Also, don’t worry about who it was with because you can put person, time and date unknown. I will also mention at this stage that adultery is probably the simplest, easiest and least unpleasant (surprising that they may seem) way of getting divorced because the petition goes into a few lines and doesn’t have a whole page of unreasonable behaviour where one party is slagging off the other. It is also worth noting that if you are getting divorced on the grounds of adultery you don’t need to gather ten pages of information on how unreasonable they have been. All doing that achieves is increasing your legal bill and really wicks off your ex. Don’t do it.

Unreasonable behaviour

You need about four grounds for unreasonable behaviour. The juicier the better and perhaps come up with a “brief” (and I emphasize on “brief”) list of unreasonable behaviour and let your solicitor decide which one to use. I say make it a brief list because if it is a long list your solicitor is going to charge you £175 per hour to read it! (More on solicitors costs later). As with adultery, it doesn’t matter how many counts of unreasonable behaviour you have, try and get away with as few as possible (it will reduce your legal bill!).

Living apart

If you and your spouse have lived apart for two years and both want a divorce, hey presto, the jobs done. You have all you need.

If your spouse doesn’t consent to a divorce and you have lived apart for five years then you are entitled to a divorce. There is also a slightly different ground “desertion”. This really amounts to the same thing as living apart for five years and to all intents and purposes is the same. From what I gather the main difference between living apart for five years and desertion after five years is that living apart after five years you know where your spouse is and with desertion you don’t. The practicalities in both cases are exactly the same because you will have to swear an affidavit to say what you have done to get your partner to either sign documents or to find your partner.

So there you have it. Everything you need to know about dissolving your marriage in one easy lesson.

The next paragraph will help remove some of the stress (I hope) and keep the bill down.

Legal costs

The majority of legal costs are incurred by clients. Yes, that might surprise you but clients incur their own legal costs. Why? Simply because they write to their solicitor, they ring their solicitor, they get letters from their solicitor in response to things they have asked. All that costs money. First thing I will say therefore is “speak” when you’re spoken to. Don’t write or telephone unnecessarily. I know it’s difficult when you feel your solicitor is not corresponding with you but I will tell you how to deal with that later. Let me just tell you at this point that the majority of times that a solicitor doesn’t correspond with the client is because they have got nothing to correspond about. An obstructive spouse can soon slow the process down to a snails pace. Remember that if your solicitor doesn’t get you divorced then your solicitor doesn’t get paid. The solicitor therefore wants your divorce to move as quickly as it can. Please bear that in mind.

Try to avoid telephones. Telephone calls can run away with time and £175 per hour that soon happens. Commit everything to writing and keep the writing brief and to the point. Do the following when writing to your solicitor:

Make sure that the letter is really well spaced. It is much quicker to read a well spaced paragraph than a huge paragraph containing loads of points. I always do this when I go to court. I make sure that each document has only one sentence per paragraph! Don’t worry about the grammatical layout of the letter, you’re not in an English lesson in school. You are simply making it easy to read. So, one sentence per paragraph and even better if you number each paragraph. That way, when you happen to be speaking to your solicitor you can say paragraph x of my letter of the y date.

Don’t argue over trivial things. If you spend two hours arguing, solicitor to solicitor over a CD collection that solicitors argument (two hours each side times £175 per hour) will cost you, between you, £750. You can buy quite a few CD’s for £75. Don’t get dragged into arguments over trivia.

Agree solicitor’s costs with outset. A solicitor has to give you their standard terms of business which will include details of the hourly rate, complaints procedure and everything else you need to know. Unfortunately, it usually runs into about 18 pages of small print. It is all relevant. Read it end to end and digest. The most important parts are:

a) the hourly charging rate

b) what the exact job they are doing for you is

c) the complaints procedure

Agree at outset not the hourly rate but get an estimate of costs for doing the whole job. As for this to have disbursements listed as a completely separate thing. Disbursements are other costs, not solicitor’s costs, but things such as court fee’s etc. There is nothing worse than being told that something will cost you £1000 only to find out that on top of that there is a £600 court fee. Ask, and get it in writing.

Make sure that you set a limit (and get the solicitor to confirm it in writing) of costs which will not be exceeded without your authority.

I can not emphasise the importance of agreeing costs and costs limits at outset. If your solicitor for some reason doesn’t confirm what is agreed between you, you write it down and send it to your solicitor as conformation of what you have agreed. Make sure that you keep a copy of all correspondence and do make sure that all correspondence is dated. You wouldn’t believe how many people send letters in with no date.

Partly under the heading of what could be correspondence but also most relevant costs I must mention email. Email is great. The same rules with regards to writing letters apply but two of the advantages of email has are time (all you have got to do is press a button and it arrives at the other end) and convenience. Those two advantages are its downfall. It’s so easy to simply fire an email off to your solicitor. Remember that an email is treated like a letter and you will be charged £15 for receiving it. You also get charged £15 replying to it so, think carefully.

Let me tell you know that your divorce is not going to cost you hundreds of pounds. It is going to cost you thousands of pounds. A do it yourself divorce with no arguments over money or children can be done for you for a few hundred pounds. If you get appendicitis, you can probably take your own appendix out but we wouldn’t suggest it. My suggestion is to set up a standing order to pay your solicitor (say) £200 per month because then, after twelve months you have paid £2500 (which will be plus VAT) without it hurting quite so much.

Time scale

You can get divorced in six weeks. It is likely to take six months or at least longer. You can often, delays are caused by the spouse’s solicitor trying to extract information from his client. It’s like pulling teeth. Sometimes a simple exchange of correspondence can take 6 weeks. So, the majority of delays (this will surprise you) are usually caused by a spouse. Once again, agree a time scale with your solicitor for dealing with correspondence.

Posted in Divorce, marriage breakdown | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – uk Legal facts (Part 1)

1. If your terms and conditions are printed on the back of an invoice they don’t apply to the contract unless the parties have dealt with each other before over a “regular course of dealings”.

2. Speeding is what is known as “an offence of strict liability”. This means that if you travel at 31 mph in a 30 area you commit an offence. It means that there is no defence to it. It doesn’t matter that your partner is on the back seat of the car about to have a baby, you have got diarrhoea, your car is on fire and you’re trying to get it off the motorway. You still are committing an offence. You may have what is known as “mitigation” or “mitigating circumstances” but you do not have an offence. There is no defence for speeding. Mitigating circumstances simply mean that you have a reasonable excuse.

3. The definition of theft is “appropriation of property: belonging to another: with the intent to permanently deprive:”. Unless all elements are present then it is not theft. So, if someone you don’t even know borrows your lawnmower and leaves a note which says, “I have borrowed your lawnmower to mow my lawn and I will bring it back tomorrow”, that person hasn’t actually done anything wrong! Ironic but true. He doesn’t intend to permanently deprive you of the lawnmower because he says he is bringing it back. No offence. No point calling the police.

4. If you walk through the middle of a farmer’s field then that’s trespass. However the remedy for trespass is damages (compensation). However to get compensation you have to have suffered loss. So, if all you have done is simply walked across the grass there is nothing that Mr Farmer can do. If you damage crops then that is another matter and you are liable to be prosecuted for criminal damage. Criminal damage is another subject altogether.

5. If a parking or speeding ticket has an obviously wrong date on or has the colour of your car wrong or has the registration number written incorrectly don’t think that you can necessarily get off on a technicality. If the registration number on the certificate is down as ABC123 and it should be ACB123 then Magistrates are likely to allow this under what is known as “slip rule” which allows minor errors in paperwork to be admitted. You can try it, but it won’t work.

6. If you buy a house with someone on a joint mortgage and they go bankrupt then you remain liable for the whole mortgage. In addition, their half of the house (if it’s worth anything) then belongs to the trustee in bankruptcy. Ironically enough the trustee in bankruptcy doesn’t have to contribute to the mortgage but can take any proceeds such as rent. Think carefully before you buy a house with anybody else if they are not of excellent financial standing.

7. If you rent a house you are usually required to pay a deposit. Since the 1st April 2009 the landlord must put this in a Tenants Deposit Scheme. If the Landlord doesn’t then the legislation provides for a Tenant whose landlord hasn’t put a deposit into such a scheme to get three times the amount of the deposit as compensation. This does not mean that if the Landlord hasn’t put your £500 deposit into a scheme you get £1500 back. It means that if you have suffered any loss as a result of the Landlords failure to put the money in a scheme then he is liable to pay you compensation in respect of his failure. Please note that in English Law, to get compensation, you have to have suffered loss so that means that if you were to get £1500 compensation (for your £500 deposit) you have to have suffered £1500 worth of loss. English Law does not punish it compensates.

8. Technically, there is no such thing as an accident. Have you noticed that road traffic accidents are no longer called road traffic accidents but are called RTC’s (road traffic collisions)? This is because nothing ever happens accidentally. If there has been a collision between two vehicles for example it has been caused by the negligence by either one party or the other. Sometimes they are equally to blame but, none the less, they have both been negligent.

9. There is no such thing as a joint will. There is what is known as a “mirror will” where by two parties leave all their worldly wealth’s to each other in the same terms.

10. If you write a will leaving everything to your spouse and then get divorced that money/those assets, which you left to your spouse will pass into the residue of the estate. Similarly, if you write a will leaving everything to the cat’s home and then get married, the will is void in its entirety.

Posted in English Law, Family Law, illegal parking fines, illegal parking tickets, Legal advice, motoring offences, Parking, Parking Fines, parking offences, Road Traffic, Speeding | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – uk Legal facts (Part 2)

11. Beneficiaries of a will can be executors/trustees but can not be witnesses. Nor can spouses of witnesses (it’s debateable whether a non civil partner is included in this definition but legally not) can not be witnesses either.

12. Certain transactions (for example land) have to be done by deed. To make a document a deed it must say “this is a deed” or such like. The deed must be “signed, witnessed and delivered”. Actually it is sufficient for it to be intended to be delivered even if it never was. Prior to 1989 it had to be “signed sealed delivered” (as in the Stevie Wonder song…I’m yours). The rules changed in 1989.

13. A will has been written to probate on the shell of an egg and on the side of a toilet. Not recommended but it can be done.

14. A soldier’s will (about to go into action) does not need to be witnessed and can be written in pencil.

15. The shortest provisions in any will are “all to wife”. The will must still revoke earlier wills, appoint executors, be dated and be signed and witnessed.

16. If you leave somebody an asset (as apposed to the use of an asset) you can not dictate what happens to it after your death. For example you can not say that “my son can have my house but if he gets married he has got to sell it and have the money instead”. This amounts to an “instruction from the grave” and is not allowed.

17. You can not give an asset away but retain an interest in it to avoid inheritance tax. Either you give the asset away or you don’t. If you transfer your house to your children but continue to live in it rent free then the revenue are likely to view this as “a gift with reservation” and treat it as though you still owned it for inheritance tax purposes. There is no way of giving assets away but retaining control of them. And, yes, if you give all your assets away to your children they can spend them, sell them, or do whatever they like with them. That’s what giving them away means.

18. If you make a nut and bolt costing 10p and you know that it is going to be used in an airplane and the airplane falls out of the sky because the bolt broke, then the measure of damages can be totally disproportionate to the value of the faulty item provided that it was “within the contemplation of the parties” what it would be used for.

19. If you’re getting divorced then English courts no longer apportion blame. It doesn’t matter that you actually catch your partner in a compromising situation it will not affect the financial outcome of any divorce settlement. The only time that a court will apportion blame in divorce is if conduct of one party has affected children.

20. Once a will has been admitted to probate it becomes it becomes a public document. Anybody can obtain a copy from the Probate Registry for a fee of £5 providing they know the place and date of birth. For that reason it is probably a good idea, if you’re excluding somebody from your will not to mention why. That would usually be dealt with by a separate “letter of wishes”.

Posted in Divorce, English Law, Family Law, Inheritance tax, Legal advice | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – uk Legal facts (Part 3)

21. If you are a UK resident and you also have property in France or Spain then you should also have French or Spanish (or any other country for that matter) will to deal with those countries assets. Other countries inheritance laws often completely different from those of United Kingdom.

22. If you tear up a will by accident, and not intending to, that doesn’t revoke a will.

23. If your partner, in the middle of a heated argument tears your will, that doesn’t revoke it either.

24. If you leave someone your house in a will then they inherit the house that you live in at the date that you wrote the will. The same goes for any other assets. It is the assets that you own at the date that you wrote the will. So, if you leave “my house and car” it is the house and car that you own at the date you wrote the will. If you subsequently sell the house and move into another one or you sell the car and buy another one then the person you thought was going to get the house and the car wont. It should say “the house and car I own at the date of my death”.

25. If you put words in the will to the effect of “the will being un-contestable” they are of no effect. There is no such thing as an un-contestable will.

26. If you die without making a will then your assets go to survivors of your estate under the rules of intestacy. They don’t necessarily go all to your spouse. Hence it is so important to write a will.

27. If you leave something in your will to (for example) your son and your son predeceases you then the asset left to your son does not automatically go to his children (if he has any) unless the will specifically says so.

28. A will must have two witnesses who should sign their name, print their name and add their address and occupation. Both witnesses must be present when the testator (the person writing the will) or testatrix (if female) signs the will.

29. Any agreement to transfer a property must be in writing to be enforceable.

30. In addition to the agreement to transfer the property being in writing the actual document doing the transfer from one person to another must be a deed.

Posted in Divorce, English Law, Family Law, Inheritance tax, Legal advice, marriage breakdown, UK Law | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitors – uk Legal facts (Part 4)

31. A freehold flat is virtually unmortgagable and therefore unsaleable. It is however possible to mortgage (and sell) a freehold flats in Scarborough, Glasgow and Edinburgh. It’s all to do with a freehold not benefiting from (amongst other things) the right of support. You may ask therefore, “why Scarborough, Glasgow and Edinburgh”. Quite simply because some lenders will take a commercial view on properties in those areas. With regards to Scarborough for example the list of lenders that will lend on a freehold flat in Scarborough comes down to a short list of one. For the rest of the country, freehold flats are simply unmortgageable and therefore unsaleable.

32. If you sign a document agreeing to some terms and conditions without understanding or reading that document then you are bound by those terms and conditions even though you didn’t understand them or read.

33. A sign which says “trespasses will be prosecuted” is nonsense. A prosecution is a criminal matter whereas trespass is a civil matter. You can not prosecute trespasses. You may be able to sue them for damages but you can not prosecute them.

34. There is nothing in law which says that on the road you have to drive on the left. If you decide to drive on the right however (apart from probably causing an accident) you are likely to be charged with careless, reckless, dangerous, or such like driving. There is also driving without due care and attention which is somewhat milder.

35. It is not an offence to use your mobile telephone to call the emergency services, while you are driving. Not recommended but not illegal.

36. Driving a car on tyres with a tread depth below the legal minimum of 1.6mm is an endorsable offence for which you will get three points minimum. You will also get a fine.

37. A bailiff has no right to enter into your house unless you invite them in. Once you have invited the bailiff in they can then remove goods if they have an order. You can however withdraw the consent and ask them to leave. If they don’t leave, you are entitled to call the police. They do not have the right to break in from the outside, they can only enter peaceably. Once inside, they can break internal doors to get access to goods. The moral therefore is to quite simply never let a bailiff over your doorstep.

38. If you are passing an open window and you put your hand through the window and steel a cake (or anything else for that matter) you have committed burglary. You don’t have to enter the building to commit burglary.

39. Sending abusive or explicit/obscene text messages by mobile phone is an offence under the Wireless Telegraphy Act.

40. Parking “fines” levied in private car parks are unenforceable in law in 99.9% of circumstances. This means that if you stay in the local supermarket longer than the allotted two hours (or whatever the period is) and you get a penalty ticket, although it may threaten to take you to court if you don’t cough up, if they did take you to court they would lose.

Posted in appealing against parking fines, appealing against parking tickets, bailiffs powers, Driving, driving offences, driving without due care, English Law, online solicitor | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Online solicitor – uk Legal facts (Part 5)

41.       It doesn’t matter what your rights may be or what you’re entitled to if your opponent doesn’t roll over or pay up, agree or whatever then you are faced with court.

42.       If you take somebody to court and it is allocated to the Small Claims Trac

Online solicitor giving UK legal help

Online solicitor giving UK legal help

k (under £5000) and you lose then usually you will only pay any court costs and not legal costs. This is to encourage people not to instruct solicitors on small value claims and encourage mediation/settling out of court.

43.       If someone transfers their house to (for example) their children in anticipation of going into a nursing home then the local authority can still sell the house (even though it now belongs to somebody else) to pay for care fee’s. There is actually no timescale after which the house is safe from the local authority but the golden rule is “the longer the better”.

44.       A bus driver can refuse to accept anything other than the correct fare and can also refuse to give change. You are of course at liberty not to take up the bus driver’s kind offer to take a £10 note off you for a 10p fare. In that particular case you have no absolute right to travel.

45.       Some criminal convictions do not have to be disclosed after a certain period of time under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act. Criminal convictions of 2.5 years or more are never spent for the purposes of the act and are always discloseable if you are asked. Some convictions are never spent under the ROOA for certain occupations such as banking, teaching, the legal profession, accounting etc to name a few.

46.       If you park in an area which is “pay and display” and the machine is broken you still commit an offence, parking without paying the fee. You may be able to plead mitigation but none the less, you have committed an offence. Strictly speaking, you should find another machine and pay at that one.

47.       Land Law’s in England & Wales and Northern Ireland are very similar although the procedures vary somewhat.

Land Law in Scotland is completely different and uses completely different terminology.

48. English lawyers can practice law in England and Wales but not in Northern Ireland or Scotland. Similarly, Scottish lawyers can only act in Scotland and Northern Irish lawyers only in Northern Ireland.

49.       If you take on the lease of a building and there is VAT on the rent and the value of the lease means that it is subject to stamp duty land tax then you pay stamp duty land tax on the VAT. Yes, you actually pay tax on tax which you have had to pay.

50.       If you die, your debts do not necessarily die with you. If you leave no assets money or house then your debts can die with you. If you leave any assets etc then your creditors have first call on them to pay any debts before any beneficiaries.

Posted in appealing against parking fines, appealing against parking tickets, English Law, Family Law, Inheritance tax, Legal advice, online solicitor, Solicitor | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Online Solicitor – uk Legal facts (Part 6)

online solicitor - uk legal help

Online solicitor providing UK legal help

51.       Regardless of whether you are a trustee, a beneficiary, executor or related in some other way, if you arrange a funeral for somebody who has died, then you are responsible for paying the costs. These can sometimes be claimed back from the estate.

52.       If you let the deceased person’s bank have the funeral bill, and provided there is enough money left in the deceased person’s bank account, then the bank will generally pay the funeral account without any fuss and without waiting for grant of probate.

53.       If somebody you know has died any nobody is willing to arrange the funeral then rather than you do it and be stuck with the bill if there is not enough to pay for it then you should first contact the local authority (before arranging it yourself) and get the local authority to arrange it. In that case, the local authority (only if there is no money or assets) will pay for it.

54.       If fatherhood of a child is in dispute and either the father or mother refuses a DNA test then the presumption is that the test would be in favour of the person who is asking it and not in favour of the person who is denying it. There is sound logic behind this in that if the person who refuses to test has nothing to hide then they should allow it because DNA tests, although personal are not invasive or intimidating.

55.       English law is the most widely quoted case law in the world. English case law is often quoted in not only English speaking countries but also other languages. It is possible to have a contract in (say) Australia which is governed by English law and for the English courts to have jurisdiction.

56.       Australian, al lot of African, Canadian, Bermuda, and various other countries laws mimic those of England & Wales.

57.       You do not have to “help police with their enquires”.

58.       A person still commits rape even if the other party consents to having sex if, the consenting person mistakenly believes that the other person was someone else. (that may seem a bit bizarre but there is actually a case where the couple had sex in the dark and the girl thought that the rapist was her boyfriend and when she put the light on it turned out to be somebody else.)

59.       If you are in business partnership with someone, then the partnership is governed by the provision of the 1895 Partnership Act still. The act says that if a partner dies or retires or leaves and the partnership is dissolved the surviving partner doesn’t automatically take over.

The Partnership Act 1895 says that profits are split equally.

Posted in English Law, Family Law, Legal advice, marriage breakdown, online solicitor, Solicitor, UK Law, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment